Name: Ms. Daphne Inbar, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Oren Barak
Affiliation: Department of International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topic: Whistle-Blowers Beyond the Gates? The International Politics of Unauthorized Disclosures Related to National Security Issues
Abstract: Daphne Inbar is a PhD student in the Department of International Relations at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem under the supervision of Prof. Oren Barak. Her research focuses on National Security whistleblowing, i.e. "insiders" employed by security and intelligence agencies who alert the public to classified information in order to change illegal, immoral or illegitimate activities and policies carried out by their organizations. Arguably, whistleblowing not only poses a domestic challenge to the state's national institutions and policies, but can also set off broader international debates on the security issues exposed. Thus, Inbar aims to trace the transnational politics involved in such unauthorized disclosures. Drawing from critical security theories in IR, she explores how these disclosures are debated, supported and challenged by various international publics. On a broader scale, elucidating this phenomenon from an international perspective can contribute to wider debates in academia on individual actors and their transformative political impact on security policies, both within and 'beyond' their states.
Name: Mr. Yair Ansbacher, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Leah Makovetzky and Dr. Ron Schleifer
Affiliation: Ariel University
Topic: The Contribution of Forces to Special Wartime Operations in the Past Thirty Years – A Comparison Between the Israeli and the American Case
Abstract: In the three decades since the end of the Cold War, the West experienced several significant changes related to special operations forces. For example, we can identify a significant increase in the resources allocated to special ops and in the status attributed to them by military and government decision makers, as well as growing interest of the general public, civil decision makers, senior army officials, researchers, and the media. Special ops forces were first given broad operational powers as the exclusive representatives of military forces in the field or as leaders of special operations in the war against terror who play a key role in conventional high-intensity wars.
These developments are not only happening across the world, they are also happening in Israel and in the IDF, although senior IDF commanders and Israeli security experts have widely argued that Israeli special ops forces generally fail to generate the expected benefits of their involvement in large-scale high-intensity operations. They argue that Israeli special ops forces were improperly activated in those campaigns. The main problem that these experts identify is that the forces were not integrated into other campaign efforts, which resulted in poor strategic and systemic effectiveness, and limited the contribution of the special forces, contrary to high expectations.
The research questions are:
- What are the factors that enable special ops forces to make a significant contribution in large-scale high-intensity campaigns, with respect to power building and power activation?
- What might be special forces’ systemic or strategic contribution in large-scale high-intensity campaigns?
- What are the general principles for optimal activation of special ops forces in large-scale high-intensity campaigns?
Name: Ms. Yael Sade, PhD candidate
Advisor: Dr. Eyal Lewin
Affiliation: Ariel University
Topic: Means and Methods for Developing Community Resilience: Focus on the Rejuvenating Kibbutz Community
Abstract: The new kibbutz is a relative new community organization in Israeli society, the result of the privatization process in the kibbutzim, which were collective, egalitarian, ideological, geographically segregated, and mission-oriented communities. Kibbutz society was known to have a high degree of community resilience, which is why it is interesting to examine the mechanisms used to develop and retain resilience in this new phase of kibbutz evolution, and reflect whether we can learn from kibbutzim and transfer these mechanisms to additional communities. The research comprises the following chapters:
Sade, Y., & Lewin, E. (2020). The Use of Internal Governance in the Renewed Kibbutz as a Tool for Social Maintenance and Development. Comparative Sociology, 19(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-BJA10002)
- The role of protocols in a resilient community
- Resilience in the kibbutz during the Covid-19 pandemic
- A discussion of non-combatants: Kibbutz members who did not serve in the military (a chapter in a forthcoming book to be published by Yad Tabenkin and Yad Yitzhak Ben Tzvi)
- The role of authentic community discourse in the WhatsApp group of a resilient community.
Name: Mr. Ben Zion Borochovitz, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Ronen A. Cohen
Affiliation: Ariel University
Topic: A hug from the “Russian Bear” to the “Syrian Lion”: USSR Foreign Policy in Syria and its Effect on Syria’s Wars 1955-1991
Abstract: For centuries, from the twelfth to the twentieth century, the Russian area that was successively known as Russia, the USSR (Soviet Union), and again Russia, maintained unofficial relations with Syria under foreign rule. We can even say that these relations continued into the twenty-first century, when Russian control and influence in the Syrian state assumed a different form.
Official diplomatic relations between the two states were established only in 1944. Two years later, on April 17, 1946, the last French soldier left Syrian soil and Syria became an independent state without foreign control. The first diplomatic agreement between Syria and the USSR was signed on November 16, 1955 in Damascus, and permitting the USSR to station Soviet forces in the sovereign state of Syria.
This research examines USSR’s foreign policy in Syria between 1955 and 1991, and how the agreements between these two states in that period facilitated Soviet influence on Syria’s wars. This research also explores the Soviet influence in these wars: the Syrian withdrawal in June 1967 (نكسة حزيران), the 1973 October War (حرب تشرين التحريرية ), the War of Attrition in the Syrian Salient in 1974 (حرب الاستنزاف في نتوء باشان), the civil war in Lebanon in 1975 (الحرب الأهلية اللبنانية), entry of Syrian troops into Lebanon in 1976 (لوصاية السورية على لبنان), and the First Lebanon War in 1981 (حرب لبنان).
Name: Mr. Erez Bachachma, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Abira Reizer, Prof. Menny Koslovsky, and Prof. Yaniv Kennet Maimon
Affiliation: Ariel University
Topic: The Contribution of Team Composition to Mission Execution in the World of Network Analysis: A Multidimensional Perspective
Abstract: The research examined how the personality dimensions of stability and flexibility in the Big Five modelontributed to optimal performance in an elite naval unit. The research also examined, for the first time, how the social variable, a concept borrowed from the field of social network analysis (SNA), potentially mediates the association between personality measures and performance, both at the individual level and at the team level. An in-depth examination of this field is lacking. The current research aims to identify how a soldier’s social environment mediates between personality style and performance. The research hypotheses at the individual level examined the degree to which a candidate’s stability and flexibility increased their sense of social centrality, which in turn, increased their performance evaluations. This hypothesis was also examined at the team level, and predicted that team stability and flexibility will increase perceived team centrality (network density), which in turn will increase performance evaluations. Furthermore, at the team level, we examined whether a team will receive higher performance evaluations as a function of high (average) scores of stability and flexibility. These hypotheses were examined in two study cases, the first among candidates for an elite naval unit (n = 532), and a follow-up study among trainees of said unit (n = 365). The research reports findings and implications.
Name: Mr. Motti Gluska, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Hannah Yablonka
Affiliation: Department of Jewish History, Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Topic: From Agranat to Winograd: Issues in Implementing the Recommendations of Commissions of Inquiry
Abstract: This study aims to explain why flaws and failures in Israel’s military campaigns recur, and whether one explanation for this phenomenon is that lessons are not learned and committee recommendations are not implemented. This research focuses on the implementation or failure of implementation of the recommendations and conclusions of the Agranat Commission, a national commission of inquiry established in 1973 following the October War, and the Winograd Commission, a national commission of inquiry established in 2006 to investigate the Second Lebanon War. The research also examines the work of the national commission of inquiry into the massacre in the Beirut refugee camps toward the end of the First Lebanon War. The research falls within the boundaries of three disciplines: (1) Law – an examination of the legal status of commissions of inquiry from the perspective of statute and case law; (2) Political science – an examination of the commissions’ decision making processes, the division of authority and responsibility among the bodies in charge of defense policy, and related political processes; (3) Humanities – a historical examination of the events centering on the conclusions and recommendations of the commissions of inquiry.
Seven case studies were examined: the responsibility of the Intelligence Corps and the element of surprise; Basic Law: The Military as implementation of the lessons of the Agranat Commission; the need for a war cabinet; appointment of an intelligence advisor to the Prime Minister; the status of the Foreign Ministry’s research center; the status of special ops forces; and their organizational culture especially in the area of governance and discipline.
The research also examines several issues that the commissions did not examine or review, and the causes and consequences of this absence. The main argument is that while personal conclusions (attributing blame to individuals) were implemented in full, the substantive conclusions of these commissions were neither discussed nor implemented. This research also found that the commissions of inquiry failed to discuss core issues, such as the diplomatic and political moves that preceded the wars and Israel’s national security concept, if one existed.
Name: Ms. Rinat Moshe, PhD candidate
Advisor: Prof. Orna Sasson-Levy
Affiliation: Bar Ilan University
Topic: Power Dynamics in a Direct Encounter between the Military and Peace and Human Rights Movements
Abstract:This research adds to the sociological debate on the formative role played by peace and human rights movements in military-society relations. The research focuses on an examination of the unique relationship between the military and protest movements, which evolved into a direct and personal relationship that includes face-to-face interactions on various sites beyond the Green Line border, including military check points and border obstacles, local demonstrations and protest marches, site tours in the city of Hebron and its surroundings that are conducted by various movements, and humanitarian activities in and aid provided by the movements to Palestinian communities related to their encounter with the military and with the Jewish settlers living in the region.
The point of departure of this research is that these encounters should be examined at the micro level, with its unique social mechanisms and dynamics, which differ from those operating at the macro level. The main aim of this research is to reveal and analyze the social and cultural mechanisms that organize the direct interactions involving the military and its forces and the protest activists.
The research is based on an ethnographic study and qualitative research methods and includes 25 observations in the sites of direct interactions between the parties, and 24 in-depth interviews with men and women protest activists and military officers who participated in those interactions. The six protest movements included in the research are: Machsom Watch, Breaking the Silence, Combatants of Peace, Rabbis for Human Rights, Ta’ayush Arab Jewish Partnership, and Anarchists Against Fences. On the basis of the findings, the research proposes an analytical and empirical approach that facilitates an in-depth observation of the interactions between the military and the protest movements, rather than an examination from each of the two perspectives representing these parties. The proposed perspective makes it possible to deconstruct the binary power structure between sovereign power and oppositional power. The research also makes it possible to reveal the mechanisms that the military creates in the field to obliterate the anomalies of the existing order, in which the military polices political activists who are also citizens of the state.